Community-based Participatory Research Partnership Research Articles

Understanding uptake of COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and boosters among Spanish-speaking Latines in the United States: Qualitative insights from Spanish speakers and key informants.

Latine communities in the United States have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19. It is critical to gain a better understanding of the sociocultural determinants that challenge and facilitate COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and booster uptake within these vulnerable communities to inform culturally congruent strategies and interventions. In summer 2022, our community-based participatory research partnership conducted 30 key informant interviews and 7 focus groups with 64 Spanish-speaking Latine participants in North Carolina. Interviewees consisted of representatives from health and service organizations, most of whom were engaged with direct service to Spanish speakers. Interviews were conducted in either English or Spanish, depending on the preference of the participant; all focus groups were conducted in Spanish. Interviews and focus groups were conducted in person or by videoconference. Twenty themes emerged that we organize into four domains: general perceptions about COVID-19; barriers to COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and booster uptake; facilitators to COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and booster uptake; and recommendations to promote testing, vaccination, and booster uptake. Results underscore important sociocultural determinants of ongoing COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and booster uptake to consider in developing interventions for Spanish-speaking Latines in the United States. Based on this formative work, our partnership developed Nuestra Comunidad Saludable (Our Healthy Community). We are implementing the intervention to test whether trained peer navigators can increase COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and booster uptake among Spanish-speaking Latines through blending in-person interactions and mHealth (mobile health) strategies using social media.

A Community-Based Participatory Approach in Applying the Sociocultural Resilience Model in U.S–Mexico Border Communities

Abstract: Background: Behavioral models play a key role in identifying pathways to better health and provide a foundation for health promotion interventions. However, behavioral models based in epidemiological research may be limited in relevance and utility in practice. Objectives: We describe a participatory approach within a community-based participatory research partnership for integrating epidemiological and community perspectives into the application of the sociocultural resilience model (SRM). The SRM posits that cultural processes have a symbiotic relationship with health-promoting social processes, which contribute to the health advantages among Mexicanorigin and other Latinx populations. Methods: Community action board members engaged with academic partners to interpret and apply the SRM to a community-clinical linkages intervention implemented in the context of three U.S.–Mexico border communities. In a two-day workshop, partners engaged in a series of iterative discussions to reach common definitions and measures for SRM constructs. Results: Partners described daily cultural processes as the food they eat, how they communicate, and a collectivist approach to getting things done. For intervention activities, the partners opted for intergenerational storytelling, sharing of food, and artistic forms of expression. Partners included measures of cultural nuances such as border identity and the complexities that often arise from navigating bicultural norms. Conclusions: Collaborative approaches within community-based participatory research partnerships can facilitate the adaptation and measurement of conceptual health behavior models in community practice.

The Radical Welcome Engagement Restoration Model and Assessment Tool for Community-Engaged Partnerships.

People experiencing addiction, houselessness, or who have a history of incarceration have worse health outcomes compared with the general population. This is due, in part, to practices and policies of historically White institutions that exclude the voices, perspectives, and contributions of communities of color in leadership, socio-economic development, and decision-making that matters for their wellbeing. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) approaches hold promise for addressing health inequities. However, full engagement of people harmed by systemic injustices in CBPR partnerships is challenging due to inequities in power and access to resources. We describe how an Allentown-based CBPR partnership-the Health Equity Activation Research Team of clinicians, researchers, and persons with histories of incarceration, addiction, and houselessness-uses the Radical Welcome Engagement Restoration Model (RWERM) to facilitate full engagement by all partners. Data were collected through participatory ethnography, focus groups, and individual interviews. Analyses were performed using deductive coding in a series of iterative meaning-making processes that involved all partners. Findings highlighted six defining phases of the radical welcome framework: (a) passionate invitation, (b) radical welcome, (c) authentic sense of belonging, (d) co-creation of roles, (e) prioritization of issues, and (f) individual and collective action. A guide to assessing progression across these phases, as well as a 32-item radical welcome instrument to help CBPR partners anticipate and overcome challenges to engagement are introduced and discussed.

Identifying Socio-Demographic and Behavioral Predictors of Prolonged Hospital Stay in an Urban Hospital in Northwest Indiana

Background: Hospital length of stay (LOS) is a crucial metric that impacts patient outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and financial burden. In 2019 the CDC reported the average LOS in community hospitals was 5.4 days. Prolonged LOS is associated with an increased risk of hospital-acquired infections, decreased hospital bed availability limiting patient access to care, and cognitive impairment, particularly among the elderly. This indicates the importance of addressing LOS as a healthcare priority. This study examined the relationship between LOS and social determinants of health (SDOH), patient demographics, health behaviors, and health outcomes as part of a long-term Community Based Participatory Research partnership between IUSM-NW and St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC).
 Methods: This retrospective study analyzed EPIC™-generated data for adult inpatient visits at an urban hospital in Northwest Indiana from January 2021 to March 2023. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 28.0, consisting of descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis (One-way ANOVA, Independent T-tests, Kruskal Wallis H; p<0.05), and Simple Linear Regression. This study was granted an exemption by the Indiana University Human Research Protection Program (IRB #14040).
 Results: The sample comprised of 10,916 predominantly white (77.7%) patients with a median age of 65 (IQR=22) and a median LOS of 4 days (IQR= 5). Bivariate analysis revealed LOS was significantly associated with age (p<0.001), race (p<0.033), sex (p<0.012), insurance type (p<0.001), physical inactivity (p<0.001), and smoking tobacco (p<0.001). After controlling for all factors in the multivariate analysis, age (p<0.020), physical inactivity (p<0.013), and insurance type (p<0.013) retained their significance.
 Conclusions: These findings highlight the significance of demographic, behavioral, and social factors in relation to hospital LOS. Understanding these factors holds immense potential to guide the development of targeted interventions and healthcare strategies to optimize patient care and reduce LOS.

Group Prenatal Care Models, Experiences, and Outcomes: An Integrative R

Background:The United States (US) has the highest maternal and infant mortality rates among developed countries. Indiana has the third highest maternal mortality rate in the US. Group Prenatal Care (GPC) was piloted in the early 1990s to improve perinatal experiences and outcomes through enhanced social support and education. Further research is needed as GPC is increasingly implemented in diverse contexts. This study critically synthesized current evidence on GPC models, experiences, and perinatal outcomes in the US to inform a Community Based Participatory Research Partnership between Indiana University School of Medicine-Northwest and Community HealthNet.
 Methods:This integrative review utilized PRISMA guidelines to conduct a systematic search in Embase, CINAHL, and PubMed. Two researchers screened articles for inclusion criteria and quality. Studies were included if they were empirical research or meta-analyses conducted in the US and published in English between January 2013 and June 2023. Data synthesis utilized a qualitative analytical approach that sorted findings thematically.
 Results:We retained 98 articles, including 8 meta-analyses, 4 randomized trials, 3 cluster randomized trials, 3 quasi-experimental studies, 4 prospective cohort studies, 12 observational studies, 19 qualitative studies, and 46 retrospective cohort studies. There were several GPC models adapted to high-risk groups such as persons living with HIV, gestational diabetes, pre-existing or pregnancy-induced hypertension, and substance use disorders. GPC was associated with decreased preterm births among low-income and minority women, with more significant reductions when attending 5 or more GPC sessions. GPC improved psychosocial outcomes including satisfaction with care, empowerment, and social connectedness. It was also associated with increased breastfeeding rates in adolescents and African Americans, and increased contraception use among adolescents.
 Conclusions:Engaging in GPC may have benefits for high-risk pregnancies, adolescents, low-income, and minority populations. More studies are needed to evaluate GPC’s impacts on perinatal experiences and outcomes among high-risk women.

Socio-Demographic and Behavioral Predictors of Admission for Kidney Disease in an Urban Hospital in Northwest Indiana

Background: The CDC estimates more than 1 in 7 American adults have Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and nearly 800,000 live with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD); the majority of whom require dialysis. Current literature demands further exploration on how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence inpatient and emergency services utilization for CKD/ESRD-related exacerbations. This study examined socio-demographic and behavioral factors associated with hospital admission for CKD/ESRD. It is part of a three-phased Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) partnership between IUSM-NW and St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC) to examine and address relationships between SDOH, patient demographics, health behaviors, and health outcomes from January 2022-January 2025.
 Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a limited dataset generated by SMMC from EPIC™ with SDOH, demographic, health behavior, and health outcomes data obtained from adult inpatients between January 2021 and March 2023. CKD/ESRD was determined by admission diagnosis ICD-10 Code N18. Data analysis utilized SPSS 29.0 to produce frequencies, Chi-Square tests (p<0.05), and a binary logistic regression (p<0.05). This study was exempted by Indiana University Human Research Protection Program (IRB # 14040).
 Results: This study included 10,953 inpatient admissions involving predominantly white (78.4%) and older adult (68 ± 21) patients. CKD/ESRD represented 96 admissions. The bivariate analysis found a significant association between CKD/ESRD admissions and age (p<0.001), race (p<0.001), sex (p=0.008), insurance type (p=0.030), and smoking tobacco use (p=0.004). After adjusting for all factors, being Asian (OR=12.172, p<0.001), Black (OR=3.702; p<0.001), female (OR=0.518; p=0.003), publicly insured (OR=2.76; p=0.014), and former smoking (OR=1.606; p=0.045) were significantly associated with CKD/ESRD admission.
 Conclusions: This study revealed several demographics, SDOH, and health behaviors associated with CKD/ESRD admission in an urban hospital. Uncovering predictors of CKD/ESRD admission enables focused interventions to decrease admissions. The next CBPR phases will apply advanced statistical analyses to further explore these relationships and codevelop interventions.

Neurovascular Conditions and Associated Socio-Demographic and Behavioral Factors in an Urban Hospital in Northwest Indiana

Background: Brain health equity remains an underexplored research area despite high prevalence of neurovascular conditions and related health impacts. This study examined the associations between socio-demographic, behavioral factors, and hospital admissions for neurovascular-related morbidity in an urban underserved community. It is part of a multi-phased Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) partnership between Indiana University School of Medicine-Northwest and St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC) to examine the prevalence, distribution, and relationships between social determinants of health (SDOH), demographics, health behaviors, and health outcomes in Northwest Indiana.
 Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a limited dataset generated by SMMC from EPIC™ with SDOH, demographic, behavioral and health outcomes data for adult inpatient visits from January 2021 to March 2023. Neurovascular admission was determined by ICD-10 Codes I67-69. Data analysis was conducted in SPSS 29.0 using descriptive statistics (i.e., frequencies and central tendency), bivariate analysis (Chi-square; p<0.05), and multivariate analysis (binary logistic regression; p<0.05). This study received exemption from Indiana University Human Research Protection Program (IRB #14040).
 Results: There were 1,489 participants included in this study. The majority were white (77.7%), older adults (67 ± 21.5) and publicly insured (77.8%). The bivariate analysis demonstrated significant relationships between admission for neurovascular conditions and age group (p<0.001), veteran status (p<0.001), insurance type (p<0.037), and physical activity (p<0.001). After adjusting for these factors in multivariate analysis, age group (p< 0.003) and physical inactivity (p<0.008) were significantly associated with admission for neurovascular conditions.
 Conclusion: Understanding how SDOH and behavioral factors influence neurovascular admissions and inequities in urban settings will enhance collaborative efforts to develop, implement, and evaluate evidence-based interventions. The subsequent CBPR phases will utilize these findings to explore how socioeconomic status affects these patients’ ability to seek emergent and/or surgical care. This will enable implementation of strategies that better account for SDOH in patient care.

Social Determinants of Health and 30-Day Readmissions in an Urban Community Hospital in Northwest Indiana

Background: Hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge is a quality of care indicator with implications for healthcare systems, payers, and patients. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program enacted in 2012 aimed to reduce preventable readmissions. Yet in 2018, there were 3.8 million adult 30-day readmissions with an average rate of 14% and estimated cost of $15,200 per readmission. This study examined the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH), demographics, and health behaviors on 30-day readmissions at an urban hospital in Northwest Indiana. This is part of a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) partnership between Indiana University School of Medicine-Northwest and St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC) to address SDOH.
 Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a limited dataset generated by SMMC in EPIC™ with SDOH, demographics, health behaviors, and health outcomes measures from inpatient admissions between January 2021 to March 2023. Data analysis consisted of descriptive, bivariate (Chi-Square; p<0.05), and multivariate (binary logistic regression; p<0.05) analyses in SPSS 29.0. This study was exempted by the Indiana University Human Research Protection Program (IRB #14040).
 Results: The sample consisted of 7445 patients, majority 65 years and above (56.5%), white (77.47%), and publicly insured (76.83%). 30-day readmissions represented 10.5% of admissions. The bivariate analysis revealed statistically significant associations between 30-dayreadmissions and age (p<0.001), language (p=0.008), insurance type (p<0.001), veteran status (p=0.017), and smoking (p<0.001). The multivariate analysis found that age (OR=1.008; p=0.004), being a non-English speaker (OR=1.866; p=0.009), public insurance (OR=2.096; p<0.001), and former smoking (OR=1.243; p=0.011) remained significantly associated with 30-day readmission.
 Conclusions: Social and behavioral factors were associated with 30-day readmissions in an urban community hospital. Incorporating SDOH and behavioral interventions into hospital readmission reduction programs may reinforce these programs. The upcoming CBPR phase will conduct advanced analysis on these findings to uncover new relationships relevant to SMMC’s objectives.

Social Determinants of Health Associated with Inpatient Admissions for Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Asthma

Introduction: The CDC and American Lung Association estimate that congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD), and asthma (COPD/asthma) cost Americans $30.7 billion, $327 billion, and $50 billion respectively each year. They account for most inpatient readmissions at St. Mary Medical Center (SMMC), an urban hospital in Northwest Indiana. There is need for further research on the social, behavioral, and demographic determinants associated with these conditions. This study examined the social, behavioral, and demographic determinants associated with inpatient admission for CHF, diabetes, COPD/asthma in SMMC’s service area.
 Methods: This retrospective study was part of a multi-phased Community-Based Participatory Research partnership between SMMC and Indiana University School of Medicine Northwest. SMMC implemented a pilot screening and referral program to assess social determinants of health in their service area as part of their Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. This study included data from 10,953 inpatient admissions between January 2021 to March 2023, majority of whom were transferred from the emergency department. Data analysis consisted ofunivariate, bivariate (Chi-square), and multivariate (binary logistic regression) analysis in SPSS 29.0.
 Results: Bivariate analysis revealed a statistically significant association between CHF and smoking, age, insurance type, and income. Diabetes was significantly associated with smoking, smokeless tobacco use, age group, race, income, and sex. COPD/asthma was significantly associated with smoking, age group, transportation needs, stress, insurance, ethnicity, and sex. Multivariate analysis found the following significant associations: age group with both CHF (p<0.001) and diabetes (p<0.001), former smoking with both CHF (p = 0.007) and COPD/asthma (p = 0.049), current smoking with COPD/asthma (p = 0.016), and sex with diabetes (p <0.001).
 Conclusions: These findings indicate significant associations between multiple sociobehavioral factors and admission for CHF, diabetes, COPD/asthma. Multi-risk-factor interventions may address these interactions and contribute to reducing readmission.

BENEFITS AND BARRIERS OF COMMUNITY-ENGAGED RESEARCH AND STRATEGIES FOR STRENGTHENING PARTNERSHIP PRACTICE

Abstract The meaningful engagement of older people in research may help to address their lag behind other groups in health outcomes and low participation in studies. This symposium addresses the critical gap in the aging literature and advances knowledge about community engagement by offering insight from experts on the complexities of partnership and engagement processes that vary by context as well as tools and tactics for overcoming obstacles. The first speaker will present findings and lessons gained from evaluating the needs of a self-organizing community advisory board of Black older adults to increase enrollment in a participant research pool. The second will focus on the challenges of centering a diverse range of partners in the design of a health and wellness program tailored to the needs of formerly incarcerated mid and late-life adults. The third speaker will provide recommendations for researchers interested in working with Indigenous communities and strategies for working collaboratively, and how to overcome relational challenges. The fourth speaker will present findings from a reflective evaluation process of a community-based participatory research partnership that evolved over seven years and discuss how the partnership evaluation tool can enhance partner practice. This symposium concludes with reflections about meaningful and authentic academic-community partnerships in line with supporting and building bridges between aspiring and existing community engaged scholars and older people who are experts on aging.

Validation of the Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire.

Conceptualizing and testing factors that contribute to the success of community-academic partnerships are critical to understanding their contributions to the health and well-being of communities. Most measures to date focus on factors that contribute to the development of new partnerships, and only a few have been adequately tested and validated. Methods. The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study followed a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach and a multiphase process that included the construction and pilot testing of a questionnaire, and a national survey to validate the psychometric properties of the questionnaire in long-standing CBPR partnerships (existing ≥ six years). All members within partnerships were recruited to complete the survey (55 partnerships with 563 partners). We used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach's alpha statistics, and a pairwise correlations approach to assess discriminant and convergent validity, and assessed internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Results. All MAPS Questionnaire dimensions demonstrated strong validity and reliability and demonstrated agreement over time. Conclusion. The MAPS Questionnaire includes seven dimensions and 81 items related to the MAPS conceptual model and provides a scientific, in-depth measurement tool that allows long-standing CBPR partnerships to evaluate their work toward achieving health equity.

Development of a Digital Storytelling Intervention to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Hispanic/Latino Community: a Qualitative Evaluation.

Digital storytelling (DST) interventions may be one way to address disparities in cancer screening experienced by the Hispanic/Latino population. Digital stories are short, first-person narratives that include voice-over narration and images. With storytellers' permission, researchers can screen digital stories as a health intervention. Digital stories can inspire viewers to adopt or change their behavior, such as completing cancer screening. Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (a 20-year community-based participatory research partnership) together with eight Hispanic/Latino, Spanish speaking cancer survivors, co-survivors, or recently screened individuals, developed digital stories about breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. Here, we describe our qualitative evaluation of the DST workshop. To understand what the storytellers thought viewers would find relatable in their digital stories, we applied Narrative Theory. We also assessed workshop successes and opportunities for improvement. We used the constant comparative method for data analysis. We learned that the storytellers anticipated their stories would be engaging and that viewers would connect with Hispanic/Latino cultural values. During the workshop, the storytellers felt like they were making an important contribution. The storytellers highlighted specific opportunities for improvement including sharing the stories more quickly after the workshop. Future research is needed to test whether this intervention follows the Narrative Theory causal pathway by persuading viewers to complete recommended cancer screenings.

Using a CBPR Approach to Guide Successful Recruitment for an Online Questionnaire: The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Case Study

The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) study team effectively used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach to recruit 55 long-standing CBPR partnerships to participate in an online questionnaire to assess factors associated with partnership success. Our recruitment was guided by interconnected values of collaboration, transparency, and relationship-building to maintain fidelity to CBPR principles throughout the process. We operationalized these values into a series of strategies to recruit partnerships and sustain their involvement, including establishing primary points of contact, offering incentives for completion, personalizing recruitment materials, and practicing flexibility in our approach. We aim to inform public health researchers on the strategies that enabled our team to achieve 100% of our study recruitment goal, with the intent that our recommendations can be applied by others to enhance their recruitment efforts and reach their data collection goals for future public health research.

The Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide: A Validated Measure of CBPR Partnership Success.

Partnerships that effectively engage in certain key structural and process functions are more likely to meet their research goals and contribute to longer-term health equity outcomes. Ongoing evaluation of partnerships' level of achievement of these key functions, along with their fidelity to the guiding principles of community-based participatory research (CBPR), is therefore essential to understand how they can achieve desired partnership outcomes. This article describes the validated Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success (MAPS) Questionnaire and the use of an accompanying Facilitation Guide in helping members of CBPR partnerships evaluate their partnership's state of development and interpret findings to improve its structure, processes, and outcomes. We describe the conceptual framework guiding the development of the MAPS Questionnaire and its 81-item across seven key outcome dimensions, along with 28 items measuring precursor characteristics of CBPR partnership outcomes. The Facilitation Guide provides general guidelines for sharing, interpreting, and applying results within partnerships using a participatory process, definitions and items for each dimension, an example of presenting summary means, and dimension-specific reflective questions for discussion. We offer recommendations for practical uses of the MAPS Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide. Whether used as a comprehensive tool or by dimension, the MAPS Questionnaire is conceptually sound and empirically validated for evaluating how CBPR partnerships can achieve long-standing success. CBPR partnerships at any stage of development will find the MAPS Questionnaire and Facilitation Guide useful in measuring and interpreting indicators of partnership success, sharing results, and improving their ability to contribute to achieving health equity goals.

Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships

Abstract: Background: While sustainability is crucial to the success of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, there is a lack of conceptual clarity on what defines sustainability and what characterizes sustainability-promoting practices in long-standing (in existence 6 years or longer) CBPR partnerships. Objectives: The aim of this article is to explore the definition of sustainability, as well as practices that influence sustainability from the perspectives of academic and community experts in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Methods: This qualitative analysis is part of Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success, a participatory mixed methods validity study that examined "success" and its contributing factors in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Thematic analysis of 21 semistructured interviews was conducted, including 10 academic and 11 community experts of long-standing CBPR partnerships. Results: The key defining components of sustainability we identified include: distinguishing between sustaining the work of the partnership and ongoing relationships among partners; working towards a common goal over time; and enduring changes that impact the partnership. We further identified strengthening and capacity building practices at multiple levels of the partnership that served to promote the sustainability of the partnership's work and of ongoing relationships among partners. Conclusions: Sustainability can be understood as supporting an ecosystem that surrounds the beneficial relationships between academic and community partners. Ongoing evaluation and application of practices that promote the sustainability of partnership activities and relationships may strengthen the long-term effectiveness of CBPR partnerships in advancing health equity.

Community-Based Recruitment Strategies for Young Adult Pacific Islanders into a Randomized Community Smoking Cessation Trial

Abstract: Background: Lung cancer represents the leading cause of cancer death for Pacific Islanders in the United States, but they remain underrepresented in studies leading to the lack of evidence-based cessation programs tailored to their culture and lifestyle. Objectives: This paper aims to describe the development of culturally tailored and community informed recruitment materials, and provide lessons learned regarding implementation and adaptation of strategies to recruit Pacific Islander young adult smokers into a randomized cessation study. Methods: Development of recruitment materials involved a series of focus groups to determine the cessation program logo and recruitment video. The initial recruitment strategy relied on community-based participatory research partnerships with Pacific Islander community-based organizations, leaders and health coaches with strong ties to the community. Results/Lessons Learned: While the recruitment materials were well received, initial strategies tapered off after the first 3 months of recruitment resulting in the need to revise outreach plans. Revised plans included the creation of a list with more than 200 community locations frequented by Pacific Islander young adult smokers, along with the hiring of part-time recruitment assistants who reflected the age and ethnicities of the desired cessation study participants. These materials and strategies ultimately yielded 316 participants, 66% of whom were recruited by the revised strategies. Conclusions: Community-based participatory research approaches not only inform the design of culturally tailored intervention recruitment material and strategies, but also result in innovative solutions to recruitment challenges to address the National Cancer Institute's gaps in science regarding small populations.

Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships

Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships

Translating community-based participatory research into broadscale sociopolitical change: insights from a coalition of women firefighters, scientists, and environmental health advocates

BackgroundWe report on community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiated by women firefighters in order to share successful elements that can be instructive for other community-engaged research. This CBPR initiative, known as the Women Worker Biomonitoring Collaborative (WWBC) is the first we are aware of to investigate links between occupational exposures and health outcomes, including breast cancer, for a cohort of exclusively women firefighters.MethodsIn order to be reflective of the experiences and knowledge of those most intimately involved, this article is co-authored by leaders of the research initiative. We collected leaders’ input via recorded meeting sessions, emails, and a shared online document. We also conducted interviews (N = 10) with key research participants and community leaders to include additional perspectives.ResultsFactors contributing to the initiative’s success in enacting broadscale social change and advancing scientific knowledge include (1) forming a diverse coalition of impacted community leaders, labor unions, scientists, and advocacy organizations, (2) focusing on impacts at multiple scales of action and nurturing different, yet mutually supportive, goals among partners, (3) adopting innovative communication strategies for study participants, research partners, and the broader community, (4) cultivating a prevention-based ethos in the scientific research, including taking early action to reduce community exposures based on existing evidence of harm, and (5) emphasizing co-learning through all the study stages. Furthermore, we discuss external factors that contribute to success, including funding programs that elevate scientist-community-advocacy partnerships and allow flexibility to respond to emerging science-policy opportunities, as well as institutional structures responsive to worker concerns.ConclusionsWhile WWBC shares characteristics with other successful CBPR partnerships, it also advances approaches that increase the ability for CBPR to translate into change at multiple levels. This includes incorporating partners with particular skills and resources beyond the traditional researcher-community partnerships that are the focus of much CBPR practice and scholarly attention, and designing studies so they support community action in the initial stages of research. Moreover, we emphasize external structural factors that can be critical for CBPR success. This demonstrates the importance of critically examining and advocating for institutional factors that better support this research.

Addressing COVID-19 inequities using bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication and vaccine clinic interventions: a descriptive study

BackgroundIm/migrants (immigrants and migrants, including refugees, asylum seekers, and individuals without legal documentation) experience unique assets and needs in relation to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is one way to engage im/migrant communities. Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is a CBPR partnership in Rochester, Minnesota. RHCP partners noted that credible COVID-19 information was not available to their communities. In response, RHCP formed a COVID-19 Task Force and adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) framework to create an intervention that prioritized im/migrant groups experiencing health disparities. In the CERC intervention, communication leaders delivered COVID-19 health messages to their social networks and documented related concerns. RHCP relayed these concerns to regional leaders to ensure that im/migrant experiences were included in decision making. Once vaccines were available, RHCP continued to deploy the CERC intervention to promote vaccination equity. The aims of this paper are to (1) describe the implementation of a bidirectional CERC intervention for vaccination equity, and (2) describe a community-engaged and community-based vaccine clinic intervention.MethodsFirst, we surveyed participants (n = 37) to assess COVID-19 experiences, acceptability of the CERC intervention, and motivation to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. Second, we collaborated with community partners to hold vaccine clinics. We report descriptive statistics from each intervention.ResultsWhen asked about the acceptability of the CERC intervention for vaccine equity, most participants either reported that they ‘really liked it’ or ‘thought it was just ok’. Most participants stated that they would recommend the program to family or friends who have not yet received the COVID-19 vaccine. Almost all participants reported that they felt ‘much more’ or ‘somewhat more’ motivated to receive a COVID-19 vaccine after the intervention. We administered 1158 vaccines at the vaccination clinics.ConclusionsWe found that participants viewed the CERC intervention for vaccination equity as an acceptable way to disseminate COVID-19-related information. Nearly all participants reported that the intervention convinced them to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. In our experience, community-engaged and community-based clinics are a successful way to administer vaccines to im/migrant communities during a pandemic.

Use of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model to Pilot an Occupational Physical Activity Intervention: Tailored Through a Community Partnership.

Healthcare and social assistance workers are at increased risk for obesity. This industry has limited access to workplace health promotion resources and reports low rates of physical activity programs for workers. This article describes the application of the PRECEDE-PROCEED Model (PPM) to plan, implement, and evaluate a pilot physical activity intervention, Project Move, tailored to promote occupational physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviors among female workers. Actions taken by the community-based participatory research partnership assisted in the identification of the predisposing, reinforcing, and enabling factors that influenced the physical activity behaviors of female workers. The resources and capacities of the partnership were leveraged to implement and evaluate the pilot intervention. After the 12-week intervention, the participants' daily average steps while at work met the recommended minimum 7,000 steps/day, and the time spent sitting decreased along with positive changes in health-related psychosocial measures. The PPM represents a feasible approach for community-based participatory partnerships to create a tailored intervention to address the occupational physical activity and sedentary behaviors of at-risk female healthcare and social assistance workforce.